I’m
more of a romantic when it comes to art.
Anything that appeals to my emotions is considered art, in my narrow
opinion. Books make me laugh and cry; they are art. Particular paintings make me nostalgic; they
are art. Some music does everything, tweaks and pulls everything; its art.
Dramas are art.
I’m
not a huge, overwhelmingly giddy fan over the literature created this past
century in Modernism. However, I can (and
do) appreciate the movement which reflects new cultural shifts. I can
appreciate Faulkner’s text as art; as consciously tangible.
When
I started reading Benjy and Quentin’s sections, I felt more like I was part of
an experimental quest in observation (if that makes sense). The characters are the test subjects that are
picked apart by the reader. I know their
intimate feelings, perceptions, and fears.
These characters are incredibly personal in what they share with me—or rather
what they are forced to share.
I can’t
decide whether or not I actually like the style. Again,
I can appreciate what Faulkner is doing, but this style isn't a favorite.
So far, my favorite part of Faulkner's text has been the imagery. I loved the detail of the tiny bird watching Quentin early in his section as much as I loved Benjy's perception of the world/fire.
No comments:
Post a Comment