Taking Fiction Workshop last
semester we reviewed a variety of different points of view from which a narrative
can be written. This "stream of consciousness" as the distance from
which a point of view can be stated introduced by Modernism is something we did
not review. I can appreciate the artistic motivation during this Modernism
period to record all thoughts, actions and occurrences as one complete entity,
however, confusing it may be. I am intrigued that everything experienced in a
twenty four hour period can be expressed through literature exactly how it
occurs and is experienced. I can understand how such an enterprise would fill
an entire book with only the contents of one day because the human mind covers
so much both consciously and unconsciously. I feel that because of this the
interior monologues contribute so much more to characterization than anything
else in the stimuli of the novel's drama or outside forces to the character. As
for the poetic movements of Modernism I am unsure of what I think. After the
analysis of Gertrude Stein's "Tender Buttons" by Mr. Andrews I
understood to a greater extent what Stein wished to convey, though I am still confused
as to how she achieved that and the order of words. It really was like a word
painting and set in such a style that it was rhetorical for the reader in the
sense of interpretation. The arts movement of Faulkner’s time with the
painterly visual works definitely contribute to the artistic literature as a
whole movement of Modernism. I appreciated the Portrait of a German Officer that
Mr. Andrews showed on his slideshow. It was an ingenious type of art especially
for people of that time period suspected to be homosexual. The painting
although an allusion to the painter’s love was anonymous and could not induce
any verdict as to his orientation.
Some critics describe the early modernists as artists who embraced difficulty for difficulty's sake--that may be so. But I think even more important than that is this relationship between the visual and textual arts--and it makes sense, historically, as visual (and audio, too) media were emerging, changing, and beginning to transform the landscape of american culture. So we have Dos Passos pulling the newspaper clipping into the novel, Steinbeck invoking the film documentary in Grapes, and Marianne Moore turning zoological texts into poetry.
ReplyDeleteThis is the age of experiment and flux in attempting to get at life, rather than simply difficulty. Your comparison here to painting is important--maybe even more so as you study modernist (and imagist) poetry.